$2/4 hand?

Advanced search
1 2
tigerwing
20
Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:40
11 (who?)
Agree (0), Disagree (0), Funny (0), Educational (0), Interesting (0)
#1
tigerwing 1271 posts Swordfish

Posted: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:40 by tigerwing

Been sat for like 5 mins and have not played enough with Zlatan to have any concrete notes (he seems to have changed his game recently imo and is playing a lot more confidently so I deleted old notes some weeks back)

Should I have checked river?

Table #21515303 - Brown's Gord
Starting Hand #1031671477
Start time of hand: 02 Nov 2009 15:11:43
Last Hand #1031671016
Game Type: HOLD'EM
Limit Type: NO LIMIT
Table Type: RING
Money Type: REAL MONEY
Blinds are now $2/$4
Button is at seat 6
Seat 1: asharne - $112.60
Seat 2: tigerwing - $396
Seat 3: zlatan35 - $721.20
Seat 4: LOLbluffedU - $418
Seat 5: PatIvey - $428.40
Seat 6: ChloeBale - $216
Moving Button to seat 1
tigerwing posts small blind ($2)
zlatan35 posts big blind ($4)
Shuffling Deck
Dealing Cards
Dealing to tigerwing
LOLbluffedU folds
PatIvey folds
ChloeBale folds
asharne folds
tigerwing raises to $16
zlatan35 calls $16
Dealing Flop
tigerwing bets $22
zlatan35 calls $22
Dealing Turn
tigerwing bets $42
zlatan35 calls $42
Dealing River
tigerwing bets $90
zlatan35 raises to $641.20 (all-in)
tigerwing can't believe it.
asharne suggests tigerwing brings it on.
tigerwing has requested more time
tigerwing is using the time bank
#2
ScottyStarburst 577 posts Scorpionfish

Posted: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:13 by ScottyStarburst

checking and betting are both fine I think, almost certainly never calling the river tho, i kinda prefer betting like 140 on the river if im going to bet tho, just to turn it into looking more like a 3 barrel bluff, but thats just me
#3
mike456111 74 posts Mackerel

Posted: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:40 by mike456111

I don't agree with scotty for the 140 on river. I really like your line on that board and id like to see a fold on the river.
I believe is range really looks like 75s 45s or Q5s (like 85% of the time) or a 2 pairs hand that he is turning into a bluff MAIBE Qx that he turned into a bluff but i really don't think so.

great hand for posting

best of luck to ya tigerwing

Mike456111
#4
TheSqueeze 4243 posts Box Jellyfish

Posted: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:50 by TheSqueeze

I think its a 56 or 57 and a fold and u played it perfect Tigerwing just seems unlucky.
#5
IneedUrChips 4636 posts Box Jellyfish

Posted: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:09 by IneedUrChips

I dont rly like that riverbet too much. Board is wet as Hiltion's pussy, so 3barreling isnt really efficient - only when u want to turn your own hand in to a bluff.

But thats exactly what Zlantan did here, so basicly a check/call wud been better. Might even snapcall river in the line youve taken too.
#6
japete 523 posts Scorpionfish

Posted: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:25 by japete

tough spot but im in chips's page.

check/call river

cheers
#7
jjoel87 202 posts Blue Whale

Posted: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:54 by jjoel87

Yeh maybe a check call would have been the cheaper way for showdown, i cannot rly see this being a bluff unless he put you on a strong Q. U made a thin bet at the river for which seems like a stopper bet rather than for value, maybe hes read this and threw a bluff in to robb the pot.

either way its a very hard call, but im saying 56, for him to be on a decent Q or 2 pair he should have reraised on one of the streets...
#8

Posted: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:16 by Robbieweeza

Set of crabs, obviously.
#9
tigerwing 1271 posts Swordfish

Posted: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:30 by tigerwing

Yeah..it's so easy when you write the hand down and look at it properly. The problem is when you got 3 other tables open and only 30 secs to work it all out.

He had 55 btw
#10
satfat 1700 posts Swordfish

Posted: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:40 by satfat

Edited: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:41 by satfat

meh, i think hes more likely turning a Qx hand(or airball planning a move on scary cards) into a bluff realising hes not good. from the few hands ive seen zlat play/posted this is a bluff v often imo. i call
1 2

Leave a post

You must be logged in to reply on this topic.
Register