Reply
|
Report abuse
Posted: 13-Mar-2009 08:50 by renoraines
I was railing that game too, because it's been really entertaining to watch over the last little while, but last night was pretty terrible.
Also, later on the player concerned did deny doing it on purpose and even offered to ship the pot back to the other guy, for what it's worth.
Is there any reason that you could not run a system where you have all in protection, but if you win the hand you only get your chips back. What that means is that if you were losing, you lose your chips, but you would have anyway. But if you were winning, you get to keep your chips, and it's tough xxxx that you got disc, at least you are not down. What that does is remove the profit from abusing the All in protection. I am sure abuse would drop immediately, while affording some protection for those genuine disconnects. It's still not perfect, but maybe better than the current system?