Hall of Fame

Reply | Report abuse

Posted: 06-Nov-2009 18:44 by slimline111

+patlevy i,d think

Reply | Report abuse

Posted: 06-Nov-2009 18:56 by brutusnr1

Think you are a canditate yourself.

But overall hard to say dont know wich would be the criteria to be there.

Reply | Report abuse

Posted: 06-Nov-2009 19:36 by TheSqueeze

Lol not me... pativey has more chance than me and i think i will eat my halloween hat if hes in there.

Reply | Report abuse

Posted: 06-Nov-2009 19:41 by dj2milli

Totally agree with your suggestions squeezy.

Pat ivey is unlikely to be in it.

PKR live winners shud be in it-so defo karl aswell

Reply | Report abuse

Posted: 06-Nov-2009 19:51 by Dustin1

Me, im a legend,











Or was that leg end

Reply | Report abuse

Posted: 06-Nov-2009 20:09 by Dunbar

Beyne is one of the best players on PKR and has shipped 2 major live tournaments. If he doesnt get it but a PKR Pro instead we know it is all politics

Reply | Report abuse

Posted: 06-Nov-2009 20:13 by poseidon1963

Totally agree with your suggestions squeezy.

Pat ivey is unlikely to be in it.

PKR live winners shud be in it-so defo karl aswell

dj2milli, 06/11/2009

I can't see how Pativey can be left out. Any Hall of Fame always contains ppls who are the first to achieve something special e.g. first to regain the World Heavyweight title, first to score 10,000 runs in test cricket etc.

Pativey was the first to achieve "back-to-back" Masters wins. Someone might emulate this one day (maybe no one ever will?), but Pativey will always be the first to achieve it and for that reason he deserves to be the Hall of Fame imo.

Reply | Report abuse

Posted: 06-Nov-2009 20:33 by dj2milli

Totally agree with your suggestions squeezy.

Pat ivey is unlikely to be in it.

PKR live winners shud be in it-so defo karl aswell

dj2milli, 06/11/2009

I can't see how Pativey can be left out. Any Hall of Fame always contains ppls who are the first to achieve something special e.g. first to regain the World Heavyweight title, first to score 10,000 runs in test cricket etc.

Pativey was the first to achieve "back-to-back" Masters wins. Someone might emulate this one day (maybe no one ever will?), but Pativey will always be the first to achieve it and for that reason he deserves to be the Hall of Fame imo.

poseidon1963, 06/11/2009

Yes pativeys 3 fts of the masters in a row+2 wins is a fantastic achievement and probably wont be bested. Im not taking anything away from pativeys performance-I just think there are better players that should be included:

Beyne Zlatan
James666
Discomonkey

Reply | Report abuse

Posted: 06-Nov-2009 20:35 by dj2milli

Beyne is one of the best players on PKR and has shipped 2 major live tournaments. If he doesnt get it but a PKR Pro instead we know it is all politics

Dunbar, 06/11/2009

I agree completely-i was going to create a thread about this but you took words outta my mouth!

Reply | Report abuse

Posted: 06-Nov-2009 20:44 by slimline111

+1 pose if its about acheivment on pkr (pkr hall of fame)i don,t see how patlvey could be over looked or dismissed by any 1.

Reply | Report abuse

Posted: 06-Nov-2009 20:53 by acesfour4

thomasinder

Reply | Report abuse

Posted: 06-Nov-2009 20:56 by arron77

Beyne or PatIvey simple.

Reply | Report abuse

Posted: 06-Nov-2009 21:23 by QuadroxXx

I like to nominate myself as i just won an 5 $ reg 10 seater. with an all in flip HU on the river.

Reply | Report abuse

Posted: 06-Nov-2009 21:55 by danc87

beyne +1

Reply | Report abuse

Posted: 06-Nov-2009 22:23 by Kusken777

I dont whant to be there!, dont like the spotlite!....lol

Reply | Report abuse

Posted: 06-Nov-2009 23:20 by poseidon1963

Beyne is one of the best players on PKR and has shipped 2 major live tournaments. If he doesnt get it but a PKR Pro instead we know it is all politics

Dunbar, 06/11/2009

I agree completely-i was going to create a thread about this but you took words outta my mouth!

dj2milli, 06/11/2009

+2

Reply | Report abuse

Posted: 06-Nov-2009 23:22 by frozone

On results in the real world has to be Beyne and Zlatan. Simples !

Reply | Report abuse

Posted: 07-Nov-2009 03:17 by arron77

Forgot to put my reasonings.

Beyne - We all know why.

PatIvey - Unpresidented results that will probably never be topped

Reply | Report abuse

Posted: 07-Nov-2009 04:32 by Lemmo120

If you don't put PatIvey in then I really don't see the point in the hall of fame.

Back to back masters then a 3rd place finish was it?
I mean if that dosen't get you in, then doing what online will?

Reply | Report abuse

Posted: 07-Nov-2009 09:00 by KarolisT

Beyne for his 2 live achievments
Zlatan for good performance live and online.
Pativey for breaking the record, back to back winner
and meybe farryboy? for his All time Money winnings on PKR online i mean he is 1st after 3 years and if he shouldnt be in then why pkr even has those rankings well even tho it didnt show profit only winnings no losses so....

Reply | Report abuse

Posted: 07-Nov-2009 09:56 by discomonkey

my guess is the criteria will be mtt based given its hard to quantify cash game success without giving out individual wins and losses.

pativey, not even close regardless of what people think of his game, his acheivment sttands out amongst all others.

zlatan/beyne dont have too many "pkr" results if that would be deemed the criteria, i dunno if macau would be included if not then zlatan aint close for me.

james, is the same does the wsop count?? cash games?

really hard to say until i know the criteria who i would suggest to be honest .........

Reply | Report abuse

Posted: 07-Nov-2009 10:31 by EatMyDust

PatIvey and Farryboy, both for obvious reasons...

Reply | Report abuse

Posted: 07-Nov-2009 11:23 by jaywhat

1Goodfella IMO

Reply | Report abuse

Posted: 07-Nov-2009 11:30 by whiskymac

Errr what newsletter?

Reply | Report abuse

Posted: 07-Nov-2009 11:37 by jaywhat

The "Coming in November" newsletter.