IneedUrChips's Posts

+ a lot.

Id even like to see it go a couple of steps further, make pkr a dedicated pokerroom without 3 million sidegames, reinstall the old PKR-theme song ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pb8dtkswN6Q ), and top max tables at 6.

I might be enticed to get playing again.  

smilerr said:

Calling is not the worst option, folding is.

I dunno, i feel more comfy folding flop than calling when so many turns will make u fold turn in this spot, esp. when OOP. Im 3betting here std btw. Like JJ, I'm really interested in seeing the thoughtproces here.  

Preflop = fine, I dont know wtf ur doing on the flop, since calling is prob the worst. Either jam, 3bet or fold imo. Given the way u played flop, crying call on turn - id rather jam that turn myself tbf.

 

The only good slowroll i've ever seen, and lmfao'd with is: Click  

Dunbar said:

TMS owes several ppl on the forum a significant amount of money which he borrowed during live events

james666 said:

I am pretty conflicted on this matter, due to Jonas being a PKR Player 'n' all, but I will say is that he still owes myself and others thousands which would not be a problem as players lend players money all the time, but the problems start when he borrows, then blocks all contact with you and makes no attempt to repay...

mudbone said:

are these statements incorrect?

This.

/thread

Please stop using reverse psychology or trying to bend facts about people to a form in which he is some kind of hero, which he isn't. He's a compulsive, lying thief and should have no right to be even mentioned in any kind positive form.

A thief is a thief, and as long as he refuses to settle his debts with the people he owes, his voice and those collaborating with/or defending him are imho voiceless.

I dont care if he's a nice guy in life, should we then release all criminals that are 'fun' to hang out with?

GTFO.
 

Dunbar said:

Funny how TheMightySwe, Jonas Petersson, is a scammer and a thief, but somehow I am the f*cker here.

I really surprises me that the meetup was a success. I mean, TMS steals thousands from the community and what does the community do? They all party around with him.

PKR pushes the entire community thing quite hard and is really successfull in doing so. Too bad James got scammed as a result of that. I think it is save to say that without meetups and forum James would never have lend TMS that amount of money. That means in my opinion that this gives the community some sort of responsibility: if people misbehave, steal or fight they should be barred. Didn't Farryboy get banned from PKR Live after he attacked a fellow player? Or was that also a personal conflict between two individuals and should PKR have stayed out of it?
Imo the community has a responsibility here and it really isn't that hard to tell TMS that you wont go to Sweden, unless he pays back his debts to James and the others. Maybe you consider it a personal conflict between James and TMS but then again you have to know that TMS is a thief. Is that the kind of people you hang around with?

Obviously we are all grown ups here and I cant and wont tell you with who you can hang out and with who not, and although my post may be harsh really I don't judge anyone (besides TMS).
But I have to say I am disappointed to see that some big posters, even friends of TMS, who could have made a difference for James and the others decided to take the easy way and to join TMS in his meetup. Missed opportunity and a wrong signal imo.
(Also consider that it was all paid for with stolen money. Did you all thank James yet for providing all the food and drinks?).

FifthSuit said:

Dundar,

As a rule you have some knowledge or insight or useful or amusing contribution to make when you post.
In this particular matter you are ill-informed and the contribution is as far removed from amusing as possible.
In fact you are clueless in this matter, some of your comments are such fiction that I was even taken back when reading them.
You have no idea what transpired in Sweden on any level.
I will afford no explanations or defense – you are undeserving and I will let those involved resolve the issues they have with each other. I will however point out a thing or two that pertains to your comment and the meet up I took part in.

Right….

1) As far as I know (please correct me if am wrong) you have no IOU’s with TMS?
2) As far as I know (once again please correct me if am wrong) you have never met TMS.
3) TMS chooses not to communicate with you online - Does he have to?

If the answer to these questions is “NO” – than I have some questions?.

What is motivating your to relentlessly re-post on this matter?
Is there an incident we all know nothing about?
Is there some kind of private vendetta going on here?

Your say you are “harsh” – when in fact you are down right slanderous.
You are judgmental without the right to be so.
You claim to be the injured party ? – “I’m the f##ker” How is this in anyway possible by the hand of another? – YOU instigated the interactions here!

James is quite able to take care of this and I commend his handling. (now for the 2nd time)
This whole situation is between James & TMS and has absolutely nothing to do with you. I repeat, ABSOLUTLY NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU, WHAT SO EVER.

Self righteous medaling serves no purpose - you would do well to get off your high horse and leave this alone. The moral high ground is reserved for those directly involved.
htboi

What a load of bs. I think one reserves the right to warn other about false intent. This is what Dunbar did, and I for one feel happy that i know now.

 

You really have to be from another world to backup some cheating scumbag that doesnt repay his debts to people. I mean, i'm no fin saint, and I prolly owe some firms money, but never will I ever use friends or people in general (financially) to gain benefit from.

You, Mister Swe, should be terribly ashamed of yourself, because you are the reason people have such bad trust in eachother.

I'm not taking sides in the debate, but to those people that went to a meeting organised by a fraud should think about this: How would it be like, if this wudda happen to you?

my 2 cents.  

I heard it makes coffee as well. Only on sundays tho  

I dont like the fact that you are called 'PKR_Mark'. It doesnt rhyme that well with PKR_Danski. Since im used to have a Jabba and a Danski, im offering you a one time chance to make up for this mistake.

LET ME BE CLEAR: PLEASE REFRAIN FROM MAKING THINGS DULL AND COME UP WITH A PROPER NAME, SINCE I'M A NICE GUY I'LL EVEN PUT UP SOME POSSIBILITIES FOR YOU:

- MACCO
- MARKO
- DONNIEMARKO
- MARKOVSKI
- SHARAPOVA
- MCMARKY
- MARKSTER

TYVM  

I usually never read these threads because I think announcing ur leavage is some form of narcissism that makes me sarcastic. However to every set rule there are exceptions, of which u seem to be one.

You give about four reasons to quit, of which probably one is valid. And thats your first one.

Since you mention me in your post for w/e reason, id like to give you an oppurtunity to think this over.

In point two you emphasise on Donks 'ruling' low and midstakes. If they are ruling, you are the donk - because bad players can't beat good players in the long run. My best advice is to get in to their peanut-brains and figure out how to beat them properly, trust me, its like solving a puzzle.

Point three: Structures are bad? Granted they aren't the best in the world, but if you work on some general SAGE, you'll find that 20bb pokers is pretty ez to beat if you know some fundamentals. PKR's structures aren't necessarily bad, they are just fixed for recreational players that don't want to spend 9 hours a tourney. And yes, those recreational players are your personal ATM.

Point four: You kinda contradict yourself here, because feeling 'OK' when you beat a STT counteracts with your statement that donkeys rule. You should be more than happy that you won vs the kings of the lowstakes. If you are consistently beating the stakes for periods of time, I agree it might get boring, but the general impression I get from your post is that you aren't really beating it. So set your goal to beating those stakes, consistently, and you will see that one-game references are pretty lame in comparison to lifetime-achievements.

I think the general message im trying to point out to you is that you have a flawed perception of poker as a whole, which leads to dissatisfaction, I guees.

Take a break, reasses your game and goals, and hit the tables.

GL