202 Articles
Advanced search

Advanced search
Keyword search:


Tag search: Select all Deselect all


Filter articles

The mechanics of squeezing

Alex Martin gives an insight on the type of players to look out for to try the squeeze on...

By Alex Martin on Saturday 1 Aug 2009 09:00


Squeezing is a useful play, but is not without its dangers. By thinking about the players at your table you’ll be able to accelerate your win rate and avoid trouble.

When deciding whether or not to squeeze a certain hand in a certain spot there is a checklist that you should mentally tick off. First, you need to understand the players involved – this is paramount. The types of opponents you want to pick on when squeezing include weak-tight players and good tight-aggressive players. These players will have little difficulty crediting you with a big hand, as long as you don’t go absolutely mental. When the cat is out the bag that you squeeze light against TAG raisers, beware, as they will adjust and start sticking it back at you. Players that you should be much more hesitant to squeeze against (especially out of position) are the bad LAGs that will never fold and will try to get too funky after the flop, and the exceptionally loose fish that won’t fold pre-flop and won’t recognise your perceived range.

Squeezing against maniacs is an interesting idea, as they will usually not have a premium hand when raising. However, against this type of player over-aggression with marginal hands is normally not the most +EV strategy and you’re better off waiting for a real hand.
This leads us onto the nature of squeeze-worthy hands. What hands should you add to a squeezing range? Well, against a maniac, definitely do not squeeze hands like A-J suited and 9-9 unless you are prepared to get your stack in against them (against a probable wide range). Doing so would be suicide. Against more conventional opponents, position, image, hand strength and the tendencies of the players involved are more important factors.

With a loose-aggressive image, flat-calling the button with 7-8 suited after a middle-position raise and cutoff call might be more profitable than squeezing, especially if one or both of the blinds is a fish. You have position, a hand that plays better multi-way, and a fish in the blinds that will often overcall and go too far with second rate holdings. Given that you want to play as many pots as possible against bad players when in position, squeezing is probably a less attractive proposition, as you will force the fish out the pot and run the risk of being four-bet off the flop even if you hit (because you have squeezed on the button and you have a LAG image which your opponents will not credit).

Tight table image?

If on the other hand you have a tight image and are in the big blind with the same 7-8 suited after the same action, a squeeze might actually offer a higher expectation. In this case you are picking up more dead money, and as you are out of position your suited connectors have a much lower value anyway. Additionally, your perceived range is stronger, and even if the fish in the small blind decides to call your squeeze, you have position and a nice hand in a bloated pot, so it’s not the end of the world.

One final point about squeezing is to take note of stack sizes. Squeezing when there are short stacks willing to gamble is, again, suicide. Always take the time, no matter how many tables you are playing, to check the stack sizes of the players still to act before hitting the squeeze button.
 


Comments

vry clever stuff

Comment by Dickidee - 14/10/09 (Report)

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Join the game now!

Download the world's most advanced poker room. Read more »

More from Raise your game

Latest comments

some good stuff dude always enjoying reading your work :)

From MANonFIRE, 6 hours ago
About Poker bets: Size is everything


I think this article is a really good reality check (raise) for most players, but would be really useful if supplemented by an article about common ways to spot weak players, or methods to guage the strength or weakness of your opponent based around standard holdem scenarios. Keep up the good work!

From Sikander, 2 days ago
About Levelling yourself


its very likely chiv would check back qq or jj in this spot for pot control and not wanting to get check raised off the best hand also his bet size would suggest he wants to close the pot down (this is a common line with aa for many people, good and bad) with a set id expect him to check back also, especially on this type of board as i have to have a set or a slow played aa to pay him off so cehcking back allows me to catch up, his hand range when betting here consists of made big 1 pair ahdns and bluffs 95% if the time

From discomonkey, 2 days ago
About PKR Live III hand analysis: Cracking Aces

Raise Your Game
Levelling yourself

When too much knowledge becomes a bad thing you can ‘level yourself’ by allowing players you conside...

3 days ago

Slaying the satellites

Looking to satellite into the WSOP or PKR Live IV? The key is mastering the endgame, says satellite ...

6 days ago

Playing Big Slick on tricky flops

What do you do when you get into a pot with A-K and don’t connect? Team PKR Pro James ‘james666’ Sud...

7 days ago

User Login
Login

Forgotten your password?

Sports Betting

Take advantage of great odds and a wide range of markets on all of your favourite sporting events.

PKR Casino

PKR Casino

Excitement lives at PKRCasino with all your favourite casino games on-tap 24/7.

Deal Or No Deal

Deal Or No Deal

Beat the banker and win up to $1k in this incredibly realistic version of the hit TV show.